Model for Empowering Traditional Leaders in Resolving Customary Conflicts Based on Local Wisdom in Indonesia

Setiawati Setiawati(1),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jpm.v4i2.477


(1) Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia

Abstract

Customary conflicts in Indonesia continue to escalate as the strategic value of land and natural resources in customary areas increases. The existence of customary institutions and customary leaders as conflict resolution actors is often marginalized by the dominance of state law, which is not always compatible with local value systems. This study aims to develop a conceptual model for empowering traditional leaders in resolving customary conflicts, grounded in the principles of legal pluralism, restorative justice, and community empowerment. The research employs a normative-empirical legal method with a descriptive qualitative approach, grounded in a comprehensive literature review of national and international sources. The study's results indicate that the social legitimacy of indigenous leaders, regional regulatory support, and the synergy between indigenous institutions and village governments have a significant influence on the effectiveness of indigenous conflict resolution. The proposed empowerment model encompasses strengthening the legal basis of traditional deliberations, enhancing the mediation capacity of traditional leaders, mapping traditional territories, and promoting active participation in investment decision-making. These findings are expected to contribute academically and practically to strengthening traditional institutions in the governance of agrarian conflict resolution in Indonesia.

Keywords

Customary Conflicts, Customary Law, Customary Institutions

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abidin, R., & Firmansyah, A. (2024). Implementasi Perlindungan Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Adat Nagari Kapa Ditinjau dari Permendagri. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 101–106.

Albuquerque, I. J. Q. D. (2024). Justiça Restaurativa: O Poder Transformador do Diálogo na Resolução de Conflitos. Revista Ft, 28(138), 53–54.

Alfian, A., Kudussisara, K., Maimunah, N. S., & Susana, I. (2025). Masyarakat Adat dan Toba PULP Lestari: Pemetaan Aktor dan Analisis Konflik Agraria. Aceh Anthropological Journal, 9(1), 53–69.

Alpha, R. P., & Tumelo, S. (2024). Conflict Resolution in Indigenous Communities: A Social Work Perspective. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(10), 68–77.

Athallah, M. N., Nurlinda, I., & Pujiwati, Y. (2025). Keberhasilan dan Hambatan Program Redistribusi Tanah: Desa Muktisari dan Nagari Padang Mentinggi. UNES Law Review, 7(3), 1025–1033.

Badan Registrasi Wilayah Adat. (2023). Capaian Pendaftaran Wilayah Adat 2023.

Bakker, L. (2023). Custom and Violence in Indonesia's Protracted Land Conflict. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100624.

Bakri, M. (2024). Customary Law and Indigenous Peoples' Rights: Challenges in the Age of Globalisation. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 4(2), 144–150.

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press.

Chusnein, A., & Putra, A. K. (2021). Yurisdiksi Kelompok Pemberontak Pra dan Pasca Pengakuan sebagai Subjek Hukum Internasional. Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 2(2), 152–166.

Dhiaulhaq, A., & McCarthy, J. F. (2020). Indigenous Rights and Agrarian Justice Framings in Forest Land Conflicts in Indonesia. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(1), 34–54.

Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 289.

Gayo, S. (2024). Customary Mediation Practices: Practical Experiences from Indonesia. International Asia of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 3(2), 107–112.

Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55.

Haq, A. S., Samudra, A. A., Satispi, E., & Andriansyah. (2025). Implementasi Kebijakan Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria Pengadaan Tanah untuk Pembangunan Ibu Kota Negara Nusantara. Sospol, 11(2), 175–191.

Hutabarat, D., & Pangaribuan, C. S. (2025). Revitalisasi Hukum Adat Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Terhadap Kriminalisasi Modern di Indonesia. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(6), 101–110.

Jamin, M. (2020). Social Conflict Resolution Through Empowerment of Local Wisdoms. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 9(1), 1.

Katong, N., Junaedy, S. P., & Sendow, D. Ch. (2023). Indigenous Peoples and Customary Law in Lolayan District, Bolaang Mongondow Regency in a Modern State. West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(4), 226–234.

Ketaren, S. R. A., & Prawira, M. R. Y. (2024). Unheard Voices: Analyzing Non-Compliance with the FPIC Principle in Protecting Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Indonesia. Law Development Journal, 6(4), 478.

Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria. (2024). Konflik Agraria di Indonesia Tertinggi dari Enam Negara Asia.

Kurnia, A., Nugroho, A., & Andari, D. W. T. (2024). The Dynamics of Land Control in Forest Areas by the Customary Law Community of Nagari Simpang, Pasaman Regency. Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan, 4(1), 17–36.

Lawasi, M. A., Rachmawan, D., Iban, A., Adhi, E. J. M. S., Hidayat, H., Siburian, R., & Ratri, A. M. (2024). Reviewing Social Forestry in Indonesia Through an Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. International Forestry Review, 26(3), 291–305.

Madina, D. D. (2024). Efektivitas Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kawin Melalui Pranata Tutur pada Masyarakat Batak Angkola Kabupaten Padang Lawas Utara [Tesis Master, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta].

Madiong, B., Sobirin, & Karim, A. (2023). Conflict Between Indigenous Peoples and Forest Concession Rights Holders in Customary Forest Management in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 5(5), 18–25.

Myaskur, M., & Wahyudiono, T. (2024). Aspek Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Adat. Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, 9(2), 97–110.

Noor, A. (2023). Socio-Legal Research: Integration of Normative and Empirical Juridical Research in Legal Research. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 7(2), 94.

Nugroho, K. Z., Ramadhan, F. S., & Meliala, B. R. S. (2025). Adat dan Korporasi: Konflik Agraria Tanah Ulayat di Sumatera Barat. Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan dan Humaniora), 9(2), 527–535.

Pertiwi, P., Sakdiyah, F., & Rian, F. A. (2025). Implementasi Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan: Studi Etnografis di Kawasan Hutan Adat. Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 2(4), 589–602.

Pratiwi, B., Soeparan, P. F., & Wibisono, W. (2024). Peran Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Agraria di Indonesia: Kajian Empiris dengan Metode Komparatif. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial, 2(4), 807–822.

Rahmani, T. A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Park, M. S., Boer, R., Ekayani, M., & Satria, A. (2022). Reconciling Conflict of Interest in the Management of Forest Restoration Ecosystem: A Strategy to Incorporate Different Interests of Stakeholders in the Utilization of the Harapan Rainforest, Jambi, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(21), 13924.

Rubiati, B. (2024). The Existence and Protection of Ulayat Rights in Indigenous Communities Within the Framework of Positive Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 5(2), 320.

Sahari, A. (2022). Settlement of Conflict Utilization of Plantation Land Above Ulayat Rights of Indigenous Communities. Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 11(1), 59–72.

Simbolon, M. M. (2025). Harmonisasi Hukum Adat dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(3).

Sunarno, & Khan, H. (2023). Customary Land Disputes in Indonesia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(10), 2038–2047.

Syahrul, M., Soepeno, M. H., & Mamesah, E. L. (2024). Analisis Peran Lembaga Adat Ammatoa dalam Penyelesaian Delik Adat pada Masyarakat Kajang di Kabupaten Bulukumba. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Lex Crimen, 12(5).

Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment Theory. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer US.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.