From Literacy to Multiliteracy: Validity and Practicality of The Multiliteracy Integrative Learning (MULGRANING) Model

Vivi Indriyani(1), Herlin Triana(2), Trisna Helda(3), Zaiton Zakarya(4), Hasri Fendi(5),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jpm.v4i2.465


(1) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
(4) Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China
(5) UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia

Abstract

A learning model capable of integrating various literacies and disciplines is urgently needed to face the challenges of 21st-century learning. This need drives the development of the Multiliteracy Integrative Learning Model (MULGRANING) which focuses on language learning through the integration of various fields of science. This study aims to analyze the validity and practicality of the MULGRANING model. The research method used is research and development (R&D) using the Plomp & Nieeven model which consists of preliminary research, prototyping stage, and assessment stage. Data were obtained through expert validation and limited trials on teachers and students at the high school level, namely at SMAN 2 Padang and SMAN 9 Padang. The results of the study indicate that the MULGRANING model has high validity in terms of material (92%), presentation (96%), language (84%), graphics (77%), model syntax (88%), social system (90%), reaction principle (84%), support system (91%), instructional and accompanying impact (88%). Furthermore, teachers and students rated this model as practical to implement, with an average student practicality score of 91% and a teacher practicality score of 95%. The model is categorized as very practical because it provides a clear learning flow, varied activities, and allows for the development of language skills and 21st-century skills. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that this model can be used as an alternative in the language learning process.

Keywords

multiliteracy; integrative learning, validity, practicality, language learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abraham, S., & Shih, L. (2015). Instructional Perspective: Towards an Integrative Learning Approach in Cybersecurity Education. Information Security Education Journal, 2(2), 84–90.

Aguskin, L. C. (2024). Exploration of Multiliteracy Practices Among Indonesian University Students and Multiliteracies Pedagogy in the Reading Classroom. ESBB, 10(2), 94–125.

Akhtar, J. A., Gaffar, A., & Arifin, S. (2023). Implementation of Multiliteration Pedagogy in Education: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Manajemen Islam, 12(2), 29–47.

Alobaid, A. (2025). A Didactical Framework for Raising Awareness of Digital Multiliteracies Among University Students: Objectives, Expectations and Challenges. Discover Education, 4(1), 1–17.

Ba?aran, O., & Turan, S. (2025). Reimagining Local Solutions to Global Challenges in Education: A Cross-Cultural Examination. In Cultural Awareness and Diversity Management in Contemporary Education (pp. 99–192). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Barber, J. P. (2012). Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of College Students' Learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 590–617.

Belvon?íková, E., & ?iderová, D. (2022). One Literacy and Multiple Intelligences? The Case of Media Literacy. Media Literacy and Academic Research, 5(2), 54–70.

Bhuttah, T. M., Xusheng, Q., Abid, M. N., & Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing Student Critical Thinking and Learning Outcomes Through Innovative Pedagogical Approaches in Higher Education: The Mediating Role of Inclusive Leadership. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24362.

Boche, B. (2014). Multiliteracies in the Classroom: Emerging Conceptions of Firstyear Teachers. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 10(1), 114–135.

Breuer, E. O., & Van Steendam, E. (2021). Multiple Approaches to Understanding and Working with Multilingual (Multi-) Literacy. Multilingual Literacy, 1–18.

Brown, I., Lockyer, L., & Caputi, P. (2010). Multiliteracies and Assessment Practice. In Multiliteracies in Motion: Current Theory and Practice (pp. 191–206). Routledge.

Bruce, T. D. (2012). Theories of Language Learning in Second Language. Hurst & Company.

Buvabaevna, K. Y. (2021). Issues of Civil Literacy Development in the Education System. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(4), 5477–5489.

Cheng, L., Fang, G., Zhang, X., Lv, Y., & Liu, L. (2024). Impact of Social Media Use on Critical Thinking Ability of University Students. Library Hi Tech, 42(2), 642–669.

Ching, A. T., Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (2013). Learning Models: An Assessment of Progress, Challenges, and New Developments. Marketing Science, 32(6), 913–938.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Routledge.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). 'Multiliteracies': New Literacies, New Learning. Pedagogies, 4(3), 164–194.

Dahlström, H. (2022). Students as Digital Multimodal Text Designers: A Study of Resources, Affordances, and Experiences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 391–407.

Dawood, K. A., Sharif, K. Y., Ghani, A. A., Zulzalil, H., Zaidan, A. A., & Zaidan, B. B. (2021). Towards a Unified Criteria Model for Usability Evaluation in the Context of Open Source Software Based on a Fuzzy Delphi Method. Information and Software Technology, 130, 106453.

Dawson, S., & Sleemens, G. (2014). Analytics to Literacies: The Development of a Learning Analytics Framework for Multiliteracies Assessment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 284–305.

Drajati, N. A., Tan, L., Haryati, S., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Zainnuri, H. (2018). Investigating English Language Teachers in Developing TPACK and Multimodal Literacy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 575–582.

Elsner, D. (2011). Developing Multiliteracies, Plurilingual Awareness & Critical Thinking in the Primary Language Classroom with Multilingual Virtual Talkingbooks. Encuentro, 20, 27–38.

Eteokleous, N., Pavlou, V., & Tsolakidis, S. (2015). Integrating the Multimedia Builder Software as an Education Tool to Deliver Fairy Tales: Promoting Multiliteracies and Multimodality. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(1), 65–88.

Ganapathy, M., & Seetharam, S. A. (2016). The Effects of Using Multimodal Approaches in Meaning-Making of 21st Century Literacy Texts Among ESL Students in a Private School in Malaysia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 143–155.

Gxekwa, N., & Satyo, N. (2017). The Use of isiXhosa Children's Poetry as a Tool to Integrate Literacy, Mathematics and Life Skills in Foundation Phase: Grade R-3 Research Method. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 7(1), 1–7.

Han, Y. (2021). Understanding Multilingual Young Adults and Adolescents' Digital Literacies in the Wilds: Implications for Language and Literacy Classrooms. Issues and Trends in Learning Technologies, 9(1), 27–46.

Hassen, R. (2015). Implementation of Online Reading Assessment of Encourage Reading Interests. English Language Teaching, 18(11), 197–206.

Haythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-Learning Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.

Higgs, B., Kilcommins, S., & Ryan, T. (2010). Making Connections: Intentional Teaching for Integrative Learning. NAIRTL.

Honan, E. (2012). Literacy and Pedagogical Routines in the 21st Century Digital Classroom. In Digital Literacy in the Early Years: Old Questions, New Tools, Shifting Spatialised Practices. Symposium Organized by the Centre for Research in Educational Future and Innovation (CREFI). Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Huot, S., Loch, S., Nget, R., & Em, S. (2025). Exploring Multiliteracies in the Digital Era: A Framework for 21st-Century Learning. Cambodian Journal of Educational and Social Sciences (CJESS), 2(1), 7–27.

Indahwati, T., Dafik, & Irvan, M. (2020). The Development of Islamic-Based PISA Question Models on the Topics Concerning Quantity and Its Enhancement to Improve Student Problem Solving Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(1).

Indriyani, V., Atmazaki, A., & Ramadhan, S. (2023). Development of Multiliteracy Integrative Learning (MULGRANING) Model in Language Learning. Egitim ve Bilim, 48(215), 261–275.

Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2023). Reconstructing Technoliteracy: A Multiple Literacies Approach. In The Critical Pedagogy Reader (pp. 409–423). Routledge.

Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2005). Learning by Design. Common Ground.

Kalman, J. (2018). Beyond Definition: Central Concepts for Understanding Literacy. International Review of Education, 54(5/6), 532–538.

Kangas, M., & Rasi, P. (2021). Phenomenon-Based Learning of Multiliteracy in a Finnish Upper Secondary School. Media Practice and Education, 22(4), 342–359.

Kastur, A., Mustaji, M., & Riyanto, Y. (2020). The Practicality and Effectiveness of Direct Learning Model by Using Life-Based Learning Approach. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(3), 165–174.

Kerimo?lu, E., Ülker, M. N. Ö., & Berk, ?. (2023). How to Conduct a Metaevaluation?: A Metaevaluation Practice. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 38(1), 57–78.

Kunwar, R., Sharma, L., & Acharya, R. (2023). Construction and Validation of Self-Assessment Instrument for Students' Mathematics Classroom Learning Behaviour. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 31(2), 1–18.

Leonard, B. J. B. (2007). Integrative Learning as a Developmental Process: A Grounded Theory of College Students' Experiences in Integrative Studies [Disertasi, University of Maryland, College Park].

Leonard, J. B. (2012). Integrative Learning: A Grounded Theory. Issues in Integrative Studies, 30, 48–74.

Lewis, E. C. (2017). Promoting Undergraduate Research Through Integrative Learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(3), 545–550.

Lidiastuti, A. E., Susilo, H., & Lestari, U. (2020). The Development Exair Based on Brain-Based Learning and Whole Brain Teaching (Exair-Brain Learning) and Its Effect on Learning Outcome for Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 1–7.

Lim, F. V., & Tan-Chia, L. (2022). Designing Learning for Multimodal Literacy: Teaching Viewing and Representing. Routledge.

Litualy, S. J. (2016). Integrative Teaching Techniques and Improvement of German Speaking Learning Skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 56–61.

Mallpress, D. E., & Špinka, M. (2023). The Practicality of Practice: A Model of the Function of Play Behaviour. Ecology and Evolution, 13(9), e10521.

Mpaata, K. A., & Mpaata, Z. (2019). The Leadership Role of Secondary School Head Teachers in Delivering Integrative Quality Education in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7(2), 203–230.

Navarro, M. M., Lauren, L., Hardy, E., Lázaro, P., & Suárez, R. (2023). Una Propuesta de Guía de Autoevaluación Integral para las Entidades de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación. Revista Cubana de Información En Ciencias de La Salud, 34.

Navehebrahim, M. (2011). Multiliteracies Approach to Empower Learning and Teaching Engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 863–868.

Noh, H., Seo, J. H., Yoo, H. S., & Lee, S. (2018). How to Improve a Technology Evaluation Model: A Data-Driven Approach. Technovation, 72, 1–12.

Pishol, S., & Kaur, S. (2015). Teacher and Students' Perceptions of Reading a Graphic Novel Using the Multiliteracies Approach in an ESL Classroom. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12, 21–47.

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational Design Research: An Introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research - Part A: An Introduction (pp. 10–51). SLO.

Purwanto, M. B., Hartono, R., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Essential Skills Challenges for the 21st Century Graduates: Creating a Generation of High-Level Competence in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. Asian Journal of Applied Education (AJAE), 2(3), 279–292.

Rivers, W. (1976). Speaking in Many Tongues: Essay in Foreign Language Teaching. Newbury House.

Schlindwein, A. F. (2013). Facing the Challenge – Developing an Instructional Plan for Portuguese as Foreign Language in Brazil Based on Multiliteracy. IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2013), 337–380.

Selznick, B. S., Dahl, L. S., Youngerman, E., & Mayhew, M. J. (2022). Equitably Linking Integrative Learning and Students' Innovation Capacities. Innovative Higher Education, 47(1), 1–21.

Shibani, A. S. M., Mohd, M., Ghani, A. T. A., Zakaria, M. S., & Al-Ghuribi, S. M. (2023). Identification of Critical Parameters Affecting an E-Learning Recommendation Model Using Delphi Method Based on Expert Validation. Information (Switzerland), 14(4), 1–15.

Sullivan, W. M. (2023). The Power of Integrated Learning: Higher Education for Success in Life, Work, and Society. Routledge.

Sweeney, C., Sullivan, E. O., & McCarthy, M. (2015). Keeping It Real: Exploring an Interdisciplinary Breaking Bad News Role-Play as an Integrative Learning Opportunity. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 14–32.

Vedishenkova, M. V., & Mironina, A. Y. (2016). The Methodology of Foreign Language Integrative Teaching at the Initial Stage of Interpreter Training. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(8), 1975–1988.

Wang, Q. (2015). Study on the New Model of College English Teaching Under the Setting of Multimodality. Universal Journal of Education Research, 3(8), 473–477.

Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional Designers Decisions and Priorities: A Survey of Design Practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(2), 43–57.

Wright, S. J., Gray, E., Rogers, G., Donten, A., & Payne, K. (2024). A Structured Process for the Validation of a Decision-Analytic Model: Application to a Cost-Effectiveness Model for Risk-Stratified National Breast Screening. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 22(4), 527–542.

Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2019). The Role of Technology-Enhanced Self-and Peer Assessment in Formative Assessment. In Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement (pp. 170–191). Routledge.

Yerimadesi, Y., Kiram, Y., Lufri, L., Festiyed, F., & Guspatni, G. (2019). Validity and Practicality of Guided Discovery Learning Models for Chemistry Learning in Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 1–7.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.